<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Google Eat its Own Dogfood?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pathfindersoftware.com/2006/05/does_google_eat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2006/05/does_google_eat/</link>
	<description>The Fastest Way to Launch Successful Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: General</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2006/05/does_google_eat/#comment-5193</link>
		<dc:creator>General</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 15:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=563#comment-5193</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google plans do debug the client part of their web aplication frameword at cost free. They use Googlers to stress their tookit but they don&#039;t allow them to build javascript on-the-fly like echo2 does. Its the best way to test their javascript output in a large number of diferent browsers with diferent plugins and they assure their main aplications like calendar, maps, gmail stay clean and sharp.&lt;br /&gt;
PS- Maybe they&#039;ll give some of them a Google Tshi(r)t&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google plans do debug the client part of their web aplication frameword at cost free. They use Googlers to stress their tookit but they don&#8217;t allow them to build javascript on-the-fly like echo2 does. Its the best way to test their javascript output in a large number of diferent browsers with diferent plugins and they assure their main aplications like calendar, maps, gmail stay clean and sharp.<br />
PS- Maybe they&#8217;ll give some of them a Google Tshi(r)t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Edwards</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2006/05/does_google_eat/#comment-5192</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 21:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=563#comment-5192</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wondered the same thing myself.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered the same thing myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Gertzen</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2006/05/does_google_eat/#comment-5191</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Gertzen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 20:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=563#comment-5191</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was wondering how long it would take someone to look into that.  I bet the GWT evolved from the effort of trying to create a sophisticated application like google mail.  I doubt they created it first and I&#039;ll bet they stumbled at first with their efforts before creating the GWT. I&#039;m curious, were you at the Ajax Experience conference this month?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering how long it would take someone to look into that.  I bet the GWT evolved from the effort of trying to create a sophisticated application like google mail.  I doubt they created it first and I&#8217;ll bet they stumbled at first with their efforts before creating the GWT. I&#8217;m curious, were you at the Ajax Experience conference this month?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)

Served from: pathfindersoftware.com @ 2012-02-09 18:18:46 -->
