Comments on: Why Does Scriptaculous Need Prototype? http://pathfindersoftware.com/2007/05/why_does_script/ The Fastest Way to Launch Successful Software Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:36:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Matt Snider http://pathfindersoftware.com/2007/05/why_does_script/#comment-6598 Matt Snider Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:31:05 +0000 http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=328#comment-6598 <p>Why did you choose scriptaculous over moofx? I've found moofx to be smaller and stabler (and not dependent on prototype).</p> Why did you choose scriptaculous over moofx? I’ve found moofx to be smaller and stabler (and not dependent on prototype).

]]> By: Ben http://pathfindersoftware.com/2007/05/why_does_script/#comment-6597 Ben Wed, 30 May 2007 15:16:37 +0000 http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=328#comment-6597 <p>I'm not sure how much dependency there really is. If in fact there isn't a lot of dependency it might be that since they were sort of written in tandem, they thought prototype might help a lot more than it needed to. </p> <p>Though I'm sure since the creators are also Rubyists, they'd probably say why don't you just remove the dependencies yourself ;)</p> I’m not sure how much dependency there really is. If in fact there isn’t a lot of dependency it might be that since they were sort of written in tandem, they thought prototype might help a lot more than it needed to.

Though I’m sure since the creators are also Rubyists, they’d probably say why don’t you just remove the dependencies yourself ;)

]]> By: Rey Bango http://pathfindersoftware.com/2007/05/why_does_script/#comment-6596 Rey Bango Tue, 29 May 2007 14:50:23 +0000 http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=328#comment-6596 <p>I'd be interested in knowing more!!</p> I’d be interested in knowing more!!

]]>