One of the most eye-opening sessions I attended at Adobe MAX last week covered the topic "Building Accessible Applications with Flex." Flash/Flex apps have a reputation for being inaccessible to assistive technologies, but presenters Andrew Kirkpatrick and John Bennett debunked that myth. Using lots of code examples, Kirkpatrick and Bennett actually walked us through Flex apps in a screen reader and showed how to use MSAA (Microsoft Active Accessibility) tools – including insepct32.exe – to make them function properly. The practical, how-to value of this presentation was on par with Derek Featherstone’s talk at An Event Apart a couple months ago. The Flex world, it turns out, is just like the Ajax world: If an app is inaccessible, blame the developer, not the platform.
I spent most of the last two years working on just such an application in my former life as a UI engineer at Orbitz Worldwide. Orbitz’s new travel platform, introduced with the relaunch of the U.K. travel site ebookers.com, implements progressive enhancement on a massive scale. It was inspiring and educational to help build a giant ecommerce site with first-class support for web standards and Section 508. After a while, the techniques that make such applications possible become second nature.
Plenty of developers have come to the conclusion that you should just build a separate, accessible UI. Look at Microsoft Outlook Web Access and Gmail, the two applications that put Ajax on the map. Both of them offer an advanced client and a stripped-down, plain-HTML one. If it worked for them, why can’t it work for a lot of sites? Writer Bex Huff outlines the advantages of this approach pretty compellingly. The accessibility gurus at Webcredible have come to pretty much the same conclusions, albeit after a bit more hand-wringing. I doubt the WC3’s forthcoming Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 will provide a comprehensive roadmap, but the draft version does at least acknowledge how much the landscape has changed.
Accessibility vs. Ajax has been a big topic for a couple of years now; my former Orbitz colleage Mark Meeker has earned plenty of kudos for his talks on the subject. But why do so many discussions of the topic still start from the premise that the same client-side code should support all users? I’d be interested to hear from developers of ecommerce sites and full-featured web applications. Are you building accessibility into your application architecture at all? If so, how? Progressive enhancement or separate UIs? Let me know in the comments.