<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FriendFeed, Jaiku and Plaxo Pulse: Networks within networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pathfindersoftware.com/2007/10/networks-within/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2007/10/networks-within/</link>
	<description>The Fastest Way to Launch Successful Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2007/10/networks-within/#comment-7200</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=221#comment-7200</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I use both Myspace and Facebook (plus I have a blog on Xanga.) Back when I was in college (you know, &quot;back&quot; in 2005), Facebook was only available for college students. So as hesitant as I was to have two (or three) internet identities, I created a Myspace page to keep in touch with my friends who did not attend college. I had never heard of these &quot;identity managers&quot; until I read this blog, but without even trying them I already endorse your conclusion. It sounds too complicated. First of all, I think most people enjoy spending hours carefully crafting their internet (and probably consequently their actual) identities. But more importantly, as you said, most of us have different profiles for different reasons or social networks and prefer to share certain information with certain groups (let&#039;s not forget the time a good friend of mine accidentally came out to his father via Myspace.) I guess if you were running for office or something and maintaining dozens of online profiles these identity managers would be something worth exploring, but I think I speak for most recreational social network-ers when I say that it sounds like more trouble than it is worth.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use both Myspace and Facebook (plus I have a blog on Xanga.) Back when I was in college (you know, &#8220;back&#8221; in 2005), Facebook was only available for college students. So as hesitant as I was to have two (or three) internet identities, I created a Myspace page to keep in touch with my friends who did not attend college. I had never heard of these &#8220;identity managers&#8221; until I read this blog, but without even trying them I already endorse your conclusion. It sounds too complicated. First of all, I think most people enjoy spending hours carefully crafting their internet (and probably consequently their actual) identities. But more importantly, as you said, most of us have different profiles for different reasons or social networks and prefer to share certain information with certain groups (let&#8217;s not forget the time a good friend of mine accidentally came out to his father via Myspace.) I guess if you were running for office or something and maintaining dozens of online profiles these identity managers would be something worth exploring, but I think I speak for most recreational social network-ers when I say that it sounds like more trouble than it is worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navot</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2007/10/networks-within/#comment-7199</link>
		<dc:creator>navot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 10:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=221#comment-7199</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would like to draw your attention to another alternative which is a paradigm shift for AJAX front ends. One should be aware that I am not, and do not pretend to be objective, never the less I believe that one can judge for himself.  Visual WebGui is an open source rapid application development framework for graphic user interfaces of IT web applications. VWG replaces the obsolete paradigms of ASP.NET in both design-time and run-time which were designed for developing sites, with WinForms methodologies, which were designed for developing applications. Thus enabling designer that was designed for application interfaces (WinForms designer) instead of a word documents (ASP.NET designer). This provides the developer with an extremely efficient way to design interfaces using drag and drop instead of hand coding HTML. Visual WebGui is an AJAX frame work that doesn’t expose logic, data or open services on client requests and therefore is not as vulnerable as common AJAX solution.. VWG presentation layer is de-coupled and instead of standard browser it can, and will run Silverlight.&lt;br /&gt;
NO!!! Visual Webgui is not!!&lt;br /&gt;
Not a component library – It is a complete revised approach to developing web applications. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;not a JavaScript generator – It runs on the server controlling the browser using a small static JavaScript kernel. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not for developing sites – It was designed to provide for developing IT web applications GUIs. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not a closed / locked-in framework – It has many extensibility features, which allow integration of legacy resources (ASP.NET or DHTML resources) and the development of custom controls and behaviors. &lt;br /&gt;
Worth a look at www.visualwebgui.com, &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to draw your attention to another alternative which is a paradigm shift for AJAX front ends. One should be aware that I am not, and do not pretend to be objective, never the less I believe that one can judge for himself.  Visual WebGui is an open source rapid application development framework for graphic user interfaces of IT web applications. VWG replaces the obsolete paradigms of ASP.NET in both design-time and run-time which were designed for developing sites, with WinForms methodologies, which were designed for developing applications. Thus enabling designer that was designed for application interfaces (WinForms designer) instead of a word documents (ASP.NET designer). This provides the developer with an extremely efficient way to design interfaces using drag and drop instead of hand coding HTML. Visual WebGui is an AJAX frame work that doesn’t expose logic, data or open services on client requests and therefore is not as vulnerable as common AJAX solution.. VWG presentation layer is de-coupled and instead of standard browser it can, and will run Silverlight.<br />
NO!!! Visual Webgui is not!!<br />
Not a component library – It is a complete revised approach to developing web applications. </p>
<p>not a JavaScript generator – It runs on the server controlling the browser using a small static JavaScript kernel. </p>
<p>Not for developing sites – It was designed to provide for developing IT web applications GUIs. </p>
<p>Not a closed / locked-in framework – It has many extensibility features, which allow integration of legacy resources (ASP.NET or DHTML resources) and the development of custom controls and behaviors. <br />
Worth a look at <a href="http://www.visualwebgui.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.visualwebgui.com</a>, </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)

Served from: pathfindersoftware.com @ 2012-02-09 17:30:19 -->
