<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Prediction &#8211; The End of Ajax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/01/2009-prediction-the-end-of-ajax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/01/2009-prediction-the-end-of-ajax/</link>
	<description>The Fastest Way to Launch Successful Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/01/2009-prediction-the-end-of-ajax/#comment-9174</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=1346#comment-9174</guid>
		<description>I dunno.  Having been around for a while, this sounds familiar.  History is littered with failed projects that purported to build or use platform independent widget libraries.

The problem now is the same as then.  Applications (including internet applications) built that way will always be slower, quirkier, less maintainable, and/or less functional than &quot;native&quot; ones.

In this case, &quot;native&quot; is html+css+javascript.  Apps built using those tools will be better than ones built using &quot;pureMVC&quot; or any other utopian framework, I suspect.

Regardless; who the heck wants &quot;pureMVC&quot; anyway?  I&#039;ve never seen a plausible definition of &quot;impure&quot; MVC so cooking up a batch that is claimed to be pure is a stretch.

My $.02.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno.  Having been around for a while, this sounds familiar.  History is littered with failed projects that purported to build or use platform independent widget libraries.</p>
<p>The problem now is the same as then.  Applications (including internet applications) built that way will always be slower, quirkier, less maintainable, and/or less functional than &#8220;native&#8221; ones.</p>
<p>In this case, &#8220;native&#8221; is html+css+javascript.  Apps built using those tools will be better than ones built using &#8220;pureMVC&#8221; or any other utopian framework, I suspect.</p>
<p>Regardless; who the heck wants &#8220;pureMVC&#8221; anyway?  I&#8217;ve never seen a plausible definition of &#8220;impure&#8221; MVC so cooking up a batch that is claimed to be pure is a stretch.</p>
<p>My $.02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fsilber</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/01/2009-prediction-the-end-of-ajax/#comment-9173</link>
		<dc:creator>fsilber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=1346#comment-9173</guid>
		<description>Sounds like you&#039;re predicting a switch to something like Wicket, GWT, or Echo2.  I&#039;m all for it.  We shouldn&#039;t have to mix presentation _logic_ with HTML.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like you&#8217;re predicting a switch to something like Wicket, GWT, or Echo2.  I&#8217;m all for it.  We shouldn&#8217;t have to mix presentation _logic_ with HTML.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)

Served from: pathfindersoftware.com @ 2012-02-10 01:30:49 -->
