<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE8 &#8212; Another IE6 in the Making?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/02/ie8-another-ie6-in-the-making/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/02/ie8-another-ie6-in-the-making/</link>
	<description>The Fastest Way to Launch Successful Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Custom Application Development &#187; Death to IE6 &#187; Pathfinder Development</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/02/ie8-another-ie6-in-the-making/#comment-9266</link>
		<dc:creator>Custom Application Development &#187; Death to IE6 &#187; Pathfinder Development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=1391#comment-9266</guid>
		<description>[...] get the page to render correctly in this most outdated of browsers. And, as Dietrich mentioned in a previous post, the problem is that these deviations from the standard end up becoming the standard and increase [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] get the page to render correctly in this most outdated of browsers. And, as Dietrich mentioned in a previous post, the problem is that these deviations from the standard end up becoming the standard and increase [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Shields</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/02/ie8-another-ie6-in-the-making/#comment-9265</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=1391#comment-9265</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what you are talking about, back in 2003, it wasn&#039;t IE 6 that was the problem. We were still having to code for Netscape 4 and IE 5 and 5.5 :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what you are talking about, back in 2003, it wasn&#8217;t IE 6 that was the problem. We were still having to code for Netscape 4 and IE 5 and 5.5 <img src='http://pathfindersoftware.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agile Ajax &#187; IE8: That Sinking Feeling &#187; Pathfinder Development</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/02/ie8-another-ie6-in-the-making/#comment-9264</link>
		<dc:creator>Agile Ajax &#187; IE8: That Sinking Feeling &#187; Pathfinder Development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=1391#comment-9264</guid>
		<description>[...] projects bumps up against its limitations. It&#039;s too early for us to render a verdict, but the signs have not been good and continue to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] projects bumps up against its limitations. It&#8217;s too early for us to render a verdict, but the signs have not been good and continue to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IE8: Why? ~ Mattias Geniar</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/02/ie8-another-ie6-in-the-making/#comment-9263</link>
		<dc:creator>IE8: Why? ~ Mattias Geniar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=1391#comment-9263</guid>
		<description>[...] makes no sense for Microsoft to be creating another Internet Explorer, because it gets them no profit whatsoever. There are enough open source browsers that are better [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] makes no sense for Microsoft to be creating another Internet Explorer, because it gets them no profit whatsoever. There are enough open source browsers that are better [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pramatr</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/02/ie8-another-ie6-in-the-making/#comment-9262</link>
		<dc:creator>Pramatr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=1391#comment-9262</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve had an interesting time of it with IE8. Received a few emails &quot;saying the application looks crap, fix it!&quot; We&#039;ve got a whole bunch of hacks in there for IE6, really don&#039;t want to have to do the same thing for IE8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve had an interesting time of it with IE8. Received a few emails &#8220;saying the application looks crap, fix it!&#8221; We&#8217;ve got a whole bunch of hacks in there for IE6, really don&#8217;t want to have to do the same thing for IE8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/02/ie8-another-ie6-in-the-making/#comment-9261</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=1391#comment-9261</guid>
		<description>I remain pessimistic of ANY version of IE until they prove me wrong, I think most devs tolerate IE rather than love it no matter which version. If IE8 turns out to be another thorn then it&#039;s time it was pulled out so we can get on with using Web Browsers which adhere to web standards, I think the approach they should all take is to adhere to the web standards in place, possibly reusing the same libraries such as Chrome has done.
With so many Browsers to make sure things work in its vital everyone works from the same page, as you said otherwise we will be going in reverse not forward</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remain pessimistic of ANY version of IE until they prove me wrong, I think most devs tolerate IE rather than love it no matter which version. If IE8 turns out to be another thorn then it&#8217;s time it was pulled out so we can get on with using Web Browsers which adhere to web standards, I think the approach they should all take is to adhere to the web standards in place, possibly reusing the same libraries such as Chrome has done.<br />
With so many Browsers to make sure things work in its vital everyone works from the same page, as you said otherwise we will be going in reverse not forward</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias Geniar</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/02/ie8-another-ie6-in-the-making/#comment-9260</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias Geniar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=1391#comment-9260</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been on the get-rid-of-IE5-and-IE6-and-every-other-browser-that&#039;s-more-than-10-years-old-crusade for a while, and it just won&#039;t stick for most people. They have it, it still works, they won&#039;t switch.

Let&#039;s just pray that IE8 respects *some* standards, so we don&#039;t end up creating an IE6, IE7 and IE8 specific website (and having Firefox/Opera/Safari/Chrome stuck somewhere in the middle). Even if IE8 manages to be a one-shot-wonder, there&#039;s still the issue of getting IE6 users to upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been on the get-rid-of-IE5-and-IE6-and-every-other-browser-that&#8217;s-more-than-10-years-old-crusade for a while, and it just won&#8217;t stick for most people. They have it, it still works, they won&#8217;t switch.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s just pray that IE8 respects *some* standards, so we don&#8217;t end up creating an IE6, IE7 and IE8 specific website (and having Firefox/Opera/Safari/Chrome stuck somewhere in the middle). Even if IE8 manages to be a one-shot-wonder, there&#8217;s still the issue of getting IE6 users to upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)

Served from: pathfindersoftware.com @ 2012-02-10 01:20:36 -->
