<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rails Testing First Look: Blue Ridge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/08/rails-testing-first-look-blue-ridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/08/rails-testing-first-look-blue-ridge/</link>
	<description>The Fastest Way to Launch Successful Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kile</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/08/rails-testing-first-look-blue-ridge/#comment-9736</link>
		<dc:creator>Kile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=3591#comment-9736</guid>
		<description>Why you are using ruby_like_syntax in javascript?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why you are using ruby_like_syntax in javascript?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ennuyer.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rails Reading - August 26, 2009</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/08/rails-testing-first-look-blue-ridge/#comment-9735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ennuyer.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rails Reading - August 26, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=3591#comment-9735</guid>
		<description>[...]  Rails Testing First Look: Blue Ridge &#124; Pathfinder Software Development &#124; Blogs  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Rails Testing First Look: Blue Ridge | Pathfinder Software Development | Blogs  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Karnowski</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/08/rails-testing-first-look-blue-ridge/#comment-9734</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Karnowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=3591#comment-9734</guid>
		<description>Oh, and we just created a new mailing list this weekend for folks interested in Blue Ridge development: http://groups.google.com/group/blueridgejs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and we just created a new mailing list this weekend for folks interested in Blue Ridge development: <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/blueridgejs" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/blueridgejs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Karnowski</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/08/rails-testing-first-look-blue-ridge/#comment-9733</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Karnowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=3591#comment-9733</guid>
		<description>Thanks for trying out Blue Ridge!  Note that we just updated to the latest version of env.js on Friday, so Prototype should be working a lot better.

Also note that I usually don&#039;t recommend &quot;triggering&quot; the jQuery events manually.  Instead I do something like this:

$(&quot;#some-button&quot;).click(function(){ doSomething(this)});

Then I write a spec for the doSomething() method.  Basically we&#039;re trusting that jQuery will ferry the event properly, just like we trust Rails to ferry the incoming request properly.  That way we end up just testing our application&#039;s unique behavior.

Thanks!
Larry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for trying out Blue Ridge!  Note that we just updated to the latest version of env.js on Friday, so Prototype should be working a lot better.</p>
<p>Also note that I usually don&#8217;t recommend &#8220;triggering&#8221; the jQuery events manually.  Instead I do something like this:</p>
<p>$(&#8220;#some-button&#8221;).click(function(){ doSomething(this)});</p>
<p>Then I write a spec for the doSomething() method.  Basically we&#8217;re trusting that jQuery will ferry the event properly, just like we trust Rails to ferry the incoming request properly.  That way we end up just testing our application&#8217;s unique behavior.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Larry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Ostrom</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/08/rails-testing-first-look-blue-ridge/#comment-9732</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Ostrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=3591#comment-9732</guid>
		<description>I just tried out Blue Ridge too. It&#039;s bundled with an old version of env.js; upgrading to a newer version helps a lot with Prototype compatibility. Unfortunately the latest from github is broken in other ways. I had my best success with giannichiappetta&#039;s fork (http://github.com/giannichiappetta/blue-ridge/tree/master) - actually the August 5 version - but in the end I just ended up running the tests in Firefox. On the bright side, now I have tests I can run in Firefox!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just tried out Blue Ridge too. It&#8217;s bundled with an old version of env.js; upgrading to a newer version helps a lot with Prototype compatibility. Unfortunately the latest from github is broken in other ways. I had my best success with giannichiappetta&#8217;s fork (<a href="http://github.com/giannichiappetta/blue-ridge/tree/master" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/giannichiappetta/blue-ridge/tree/master</a>) &#8211; actually the August 5 version &#8211; but in the end I just ended up running the tests in Firefox. On the bright side, now I have tests I can run in Firefox!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Smith</title>
		<link>http://pathfindersoftware.com/2009/08/rails-testing-first-look-blue-ridge/#comment-9731</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pathf.com/blogs/?p=3591#comment-9731</guid>
		<description>Something I&#039;d really like to see when using blue-ridge is the ability to load an actual view from your Rails app as your test &#039;fixture&#039;. I can see consistency problems arising between your Rails view and the fixture you&#039;re running your tests against. Do you think this is possible/worth it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I&#8217;d really like to see when using blue-ridge is the ability to load an actual view from your Rails app as your test &#8216;fixture&#8217;. I can see consistency problems arising between your Rails view and the fixture you&#8217;re running your tests against. Do you think this is possible/worth it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)

Served from: pathfindersoftware.com @ 2012-02-10 01:49:22 -->
