Archives

I love PureMVC because of the simple idea behind it. Have Model-Viewer-Controller pattern that can span languages and therefore time, as explained in this article by Clifford Hall. I started using it in the Flex world when it was competing with Cairngorm for that very reason. Cairngorm was Flex specific and PureMVC was language agnostic.

Coming form a mostly strict-typed MVC environment, it was very hard for me to even start thinking about big scale applications in JavaScript and HTML5 which were reserved for widget type implementations for a while.

As a natural progression of the idea behind PureMVC, it started being ported to JavaScript frameworks that emulate classes through an effort of great folks like Frederic Saunier, Justin Wilaby, Tony DeFusco and David Foley. Music to my ears! Heck, there is even an ongoing ‘native’ JavaScript port.

I decided to see if the story holds and lately I have had a great experience with the MooTools implementation of PureMVC. It feels very familiar. File structure is the same, meaning well organized with recognizable command, model and view folders that imitate packages. I use ANT to combine these files in two varieties. One just plain stacked for debugging and the other compressed using YUI Compressor for production.

There is also something magical about working with PureMVC. It feels far more like solving a workflow puzzle than coding by knowing that the same PureMVC based program can be fairly easily ported to another language and in that way have longevity. Kinda leads you to think that programing is most about managing workflows of user experience.

This setup is enough to make me feel comfortable as a programmer about big scale applications developed in JavaScript. Which begs a question: “Why would you want to develop big scale applications in JavaScript?”. Because I want to share the fun.

You can read about the PureMVC developments for JavaScript here.

Share/Bookmark

There are many miracles that Git performs for source code versioning and I would like to highlight a recent one that really made my day. Pathfinder did a project for client that also has a team of in house developers. But they use SVN, not Git. Since the development was happening on our side, Git was used to version the project. And since the client is a big organization, having them change their versioning policy was not likely to happen. At the end of the project came a time for the client team to pick up the code maintenance. We shipped the code by FTP and that was that, versioning was in their hands.
After some time the client wanted to add more features that they wanted us to develop. We got the code back and to my pleasant surprise, all the Git files were intact and we were quickly able to educate ourselves about the changes client made in the meantime by looking at “diffs” and pick up the project the same day. We did our “commits” and it was as the code never left. It was touching. It is teamwork. Git rules.

Share/Bookmark

photo credit: jasoneppink

I’ve been working on a project recently that involves a desktop AIR application running (mostly) offline with a local SQLite database. Occasionally the app will synch collected data remotely with a central server that will have an administrative and reporting web front end. Various parts of the AIR application involve filling out a series of multi-choice questions. Considering that the data will be used by two different systems, and anticipating that questions and answers may want to be updated from the admin portal, it seems a good choice to make things as dynamic as possible based on data from the db. It’s not a difficult problem to solve, and I’ve done it a time or two before, but since it’s fresh in my head and the code is in front of me, I’m going to use a couple blog posts to document the strategy.  The SQL presented is pseudo code and will not actually execute.

Part 1 is getting the database structure in place.

Share/Bookmark

We have a number of clients who have taken a hard look at MonoTouch. Objective-C was just too much of a technology shift for them with their C#/Java/Ruby developers. Now with the revised SDK agreement and it’s section 3.3.1, it looks like XCode and the C-derived languages of the 1980′s are in everybody’s future.

Now along comes HTML5 with it’s offline caching of resources, it’s offline storage (key-value and SQL), and it’s Canvas. Throw in the high performance of the new crop of browsers, and you see where this is all headed. And with WebGL, well, check out this port of Quake II by the GWT team. Yep. That’s Quake II running in the browser.

Offline storage on on the iPhone is limited to 5 meg (10 meg if the user permits it), but that’s still pretty decent for an online/offline app. And you can absolutely give users part of the experience of a native iPhone app with a custom app icon and a startup screen. Will this type of app replace the native iPhone app that needs the sales channel of the AppStore? No. But in the short term, it’s a good option for companies looking to develop lightweight mobile apps for all WebKit capable devices.

Share/Bookmark

So Opera Mini for the iPhone got approved and is available in the App store since last night.  I downloaded it this morning and should say I am mighty impressed with it. It is zippy, fast and intuitive.  There was a quite a bit of speculation around whether this would get approved by Apple.  I m happy that Apple approved it.

I did notice a few quirks with the Browser but they are in no way deal-breakers. From my brief interaction with it, the browser looks awesome to me! I dont deny Safari being a solid mobile browser itself but with Opera out now, its “Bye-Bye Safari” for me

Opera Mini for the iPhone

Share/Bookmark

Tiling a Polygon

One of the most challenging problems I came across working on a .NET PDF Annotator and Editor application was to tile a 2-D polygon and also accurately determine the number of tiles that fill the surface of the polygon.  The tiling part was not as much of a challenge as the counting part. The tiled polygon was to be rendered on a PDF document since the application in question is a PDF Annotating and Editing tool. We looked for anything the third party .NET PDF rendering/manipulation API that was used could provide for the tile rendering but there was nothing unfortunately.

Share/Bookmark

photo credit: suki_fotografiert

A while back I looked at the Vaadin Plugin and tried to make it work with the Multiton PureMVC. Back then I proposed the following code:

public static ApplicationFacade getInstance() {
   if (instance == null) {
     // nuke the multiton so we can do the grails recompile
     if (ApplicationFacade.hasCore(CORE)) {
       ApplicationFacade.removeCore(CORE);
     }
     instance = new ApplicationFacade(CORE);
   }
   return instance;
 }

A little more noodling and you’ll see that doesn’t work. In a multi-session environment, each user will need his own core. Furthermore, inactive cores should be harvested, otherwise we will have a memory leak.

Share/Bookmark

As January 26th, the rumored date for Apple’s rumored tablet unveiling draws near, the hype and anti-hype keeps getting more and more over the top:

Five Ways Apple’s Tablet May Change the World

The world doesn’t need an Apple tablet, or any other

and the inevitable

3 Reasons A Microsoft-HP Tablet PC Would Trump Apple

If you want to keep up to date on the rumors, Gizmodo has a regularly updated run-down here.

There are a couple of places that have more informed speculation and insightful commentary – I’d recommend these three in particular:

Antacid Tablet by ars technica’s John Siracusa:

… There’s also the popular notion that Apple has to do something entirely new or totally amazing in order for the tablet to succeed. After all, tablets have been tried before, with dismal results. It seems absurd to some people that Apple can succeed simply by using existing technologies and software techniques in the right combination. And yet that’s exactly what Apple has done with all of its most recent hit products—and what I predict Apple will do with the tablet. …

So how will an Apple tablet distinguish itself without any headline technological marvels? It’ll do so by leveraging all of Apple’s strategic strengths. Now you’re expecting me to say something about tight hardware/software integration, user experience, or “design,” but I’m talking about even more obvious factors:

• Customers – Apple has over 100 million credit-card-bearing customer accounts thanks to the success of iTunes.
• Developers – Over 125,000 developers have put over 100,000 iPhone OS applications up for sale on the App Store. Then there are the Mac OS X developers (though of course there’s some overlap). Apple’s got developers ready and able to come at the tablet from both directions.
• Relationships – Apple has lucrative and successful relationships with the most important content owners in the music and movie businesses.

These are Apple’s most important assets when it comes to the tablet, and you can bet your bottom dollar that Apple will lean heavily on them. This, combined with Apple’s traditional strength in design and user experience, is what will distinguish Apple’s tablet in the market. It will provide an easy way for people to find, purchase, and consume all kinds of media and applications right from the device. It’s that simple.

Thoughts on what an Apple tablet should be – or not by Andy Ihnatko

Apple always asks themselves simple and stupid questions like “How will this device be used?” and “Will this be used by human beings with, I mean, arms and hands and fingers?” and stuff like that.

The iPhone UI isn’t a desktop user interface where a pen takes the place of a mouse … which is the model that previous smartphones followed. It was designed to be held in one hand and tapped with your thumb. Occasionally you’d use the index finger of the right hand to key things in.

You want to try to figure out the UI of the RAT? Go get yourself a comic book, or any other rectangle that measures roughly 10” on the diagonal. Hold it as though you’re reading what’s on the surface.

You see the problem? Your fingers get in the way. Think about how big that surface is, too. That’s a lot of acreage to scan, looking for the right buttons to push.

While you’ve got it in your hands, imagine that it’s a sheet of thin steel. That’s heavy, isn’t it? Hard to hold up for long periods of time.

Think about how a user interface would have to incorporate those observations. Now imagine that you’ve been doing this experiment for four years and not four minutes.

That’s a very long list of observations. If you didn’t come up with a workable solution, don’t worry: I think Apple has.

and

The Tablet by Daring Fireball’s John Gruber.

… The way Apple made one device [the iPhone] that did a credible job of all these widely-varying features was by making it a general-purpose computer with minimal specificity in the hardware and maximal specificity in the software. And, now, through the App Store and third-party developers, it does much more: serving as everything from a game player to a medical device.

Do I think The Tablet is an e-reader? A video player? A web browser? A document viewer? It’s not a matter of or but rather and. I say it is all of these things. It’s a computer.

And so in answer to my central question, regarding why buy The Tablet if you already have an iPhone and a MacBook, my best guess is that ultimately, The Tablet is something you’ll buy instead of a MacBook.

Gruber’s a bit more gung ho than Ihnatko or Siracusa, but they both make a pretty compelling case that something very interesting is about to happen over the next year.

Share/Bookmark

photo credit: matsuyuki

I’ve made my fair share of predictions, and this may seem to be a layup, but I think it’s a prediction worth making anyway: mobile devices and applications will transform business and every day life in the next decade.

Why does this seem like such a layup? Well, look at the iPhone and the ecosystem of applications and companies springing up around it. Android and Blackberry are trying to jump in on the business and everybody and their brother is cooking up a connected mobile device. And yes, that’s obvious. Mobile devices are going to increase in importance in 2010 and if you don’t already have an iPhone app cooking to complement your other online channels, you’re behind the times.

But if you’re just thinking that more iPhone applications are going to be the end of it, you’re in for a rude awakening. Businesses have just started consolidating after the disruptive years of the 90′s and aught’s, with the transformative effects of the web largely digested by the marketplace (the newspaper industry is still thrashing but will soon succumb). A new disruptive decade is dawning that may see the passing or fundamental transformation of industries as varied as telecom, credit card and broadcast television/cable. Prepare to take your business through a roller coaster ride every bit as challenging as the web revolution.

Share/Bookmark

Do you know every detail in the Flex framework by heart? Do you also know all the other libraries that you use by heart? Well I don’t and I often have to reference some online resource while developing.

For instance, I always have Action Script Language Reference, Wikipedia, some library API site(s), Gmail and a dozen other ones open + the debug version of the app at hand.

So what used to happen when you but a breakpoint in Flex Builder with all these tabs? They would be unavailable and any process happening inside of them could not be relied on. Since not all code runs well on first attempt, if the app crashed while testing ( think 3D, data intensive apps, etc.) the browser and all the tabs went down with it.

My solution so far was to use Firefox as a development browser and Safari ( since I’m Mac based ) as a browser for references and everything else. For crashing resolution, Firefox has a nice “Restore” option but it’s not fun waiting for 15 tabs to reload.

So Google Chrome recently came out for Mac. It didn’t impress me on Vista so I didn’t care much. I guess I was in between of curious and bored so I decided to give it a spin.

What a pleasant surprise to see every tab running in a different process. My workflow feels so much better now that I’m not afraid that a bad line of code is going to take down my whole browser.

I’ve heard that IE8 also runs tabs as different processes but I’m not crazy about returning to development on Windows. I did try out Chrome on Windows 7 as a result of the Mac test and all the issues I’ve seen the first time around have been addressed. Kudos to Chrome development team.

Let’s not forget to mention all the features that are missing on Google Chrome for Mac, primarily the lack of Bookmark Management, but Google Bookmarks or any online bookmarking service will do for now.

I can not wait to see more development being done on Google Chrome for Mac and it getting out of beta. I will not uninstall Firefox anytime soon but as a Flex developer I give Google Chrome for Mac high scores for beta.

Share/Bookmark